Posted on October 25, 2007
Thanks to TonyBlog, and his article How difficult is to be the fastest growing internet company in the world, I discovered a long but very interesting video on Google’s dominance.
I share the video here also for the ones who want to see it from here.
I was hit by several things:
- the “Ministry of Truth” thing that happens at the end of the video
- the reference to the media monopoly situation that is happening in some parts of Europe (Italy, for instance) and that is scaring lot of people
- the fact that the VPs that are interviewed do not show concern about the power they have in their hands.
They consider that power just from a technology point of view and they came out with statements that look like the following ones (I do not quote exact words…)
- if we were able to do what we did, everybody can do also.
- Why would we do something evil?
- the possibility of beinbg evil is inside every job…
No, I think that we need to come to some action before it is too late. Internet Search is too important to be left in the hands of a private monopoly: Internet Search should be property of no one. The temptation would be too big.
Posted on October 16, 2007
Thanks to an IBM internal comment, I discovered the Did you know 2.0 video referenced by Luis in his Reminder of How Much Things Are Changing post.
I have one reaction: frightening. I am scared! I mean, of course the flow of things cannot be reversed, the earth spins from West to East regardless of my opinion (or of the collective opinion thereof…). But there is a difference between acknowledging that something is happening and not doing anything to oppose, right?
I mean, not everything that happens is “a good thing”, in my opinion. We have the right, as human beings, to oppose to things that may not go in the direction we like.
I list here few things I definitely do not like:
- B.G. : Before Google ????
Could not believe it!!! There was an era before Google and an era after….
It is not that I could not believe it. This is a fact. No one can contradict this evidence. But, once spelled in that way, I think it also becomes relevant the question: “if Internet search is SO important and pervasive, could we really afford to leave it in the hands of a single private monopoly?”.
- “Today’s learners will have 10-14 jobs by the age of 38.“
I am not the person who was born in IBM; I just joined 5 years ago (yeah, I am in one of the other statistics) and have been with other 3 companies before in 25 years of work.
But 10-14 jobs by the age of 38 means that people may change jobs as frequently as each year or 18 months. Is this what companies expect in terms of loyalty from employees? Isn’t it true that people start being really productive once they know the context and the culture of the company they work for? Does this mean we will all have “contractor jobs“, jobs based on a single task to be executed?
- “Half of what a student in a 4-years course studies will be outdated starting when starting his 3rd year.“
Ehi. Culture is not only technology that gets outdated as new inventions happen.
I think that children and adolescents have the right to study things that will not be directly part of their CV. It is the only moment in life in which they can learn things “just for thesake of learning”, “just to shape their minds and their hearts”, “just to discover what the history has sedimented in thousands of years”.
We will always have the time to play with the last innovation… but we will not have so much time to read Shakespeare, to learn how to love poetry, to understand how humankind got here where we are.
Sedimentation of understanding is an important principle that we need to keep in mind. Reading, remembering… and understanding (in order to have culture permeating our lives) are still different processes in our brain, I think (at least they are in mine).
- “Young people Urgently need new skills to succeed in the global economy“.
Learning new skills is something that has been true always, I guess. The evolution of mankind just did not start yesterday…
The accent here, though, is on the urgency. Like “we urgently need to eat”…. Urgently!
I commented on the pace of this urgency a couple of days ago…
And the other accent is on the “global economy”. As a big a Godzilla from which we have to defend ourselves… Or as the climate changes that will subvert the needs pyramid and change the way in which we face day-to-day life.
Looks really like a science-fiction movie, where it seems we are starting to fear about what we are producing but we are already unable to control it.
I cannot consider that all this is unavoidable. I cannot think that we do not have a mean to adapt the pace to our biological rhythm, to the way in which our minds have been shaped and our heart loves.
Posted on October 16, 2007
Yesterday the big day arrived. The Airbus A380 first shipment happened.
I cannot say if this will change the way in which civil aviation will be in the future.
But, certainly, it is the achievement of an exceptional technical challenge that the European industry took. Successful or not, it is certainly remarkable and important.
I am proud to be European today. Sometimes we are not simply followers but we keep our spirit and soul for invention and over-achievement.
For the people that start fearing about Google, I suggest reading the following article: Google goes click.
Among the others, I liked this quote:
Further proof, if any were needed, that Google
isn’t a technology company that makes money from ads, it’s an
advertising company that uses technology to lure eyeballs
I start to believe that Internet Search is too delicate a feature, is so important that it cannot be left in the hands of a monopoly.
Internet Search should be property of no one or real competition and alternatives should be promoted.
Posted on February 9, 2007
Just happened to read this little report on Google’s CEO Eric Schmidt: Google CEO: Internet’s role in freedom still expanding
I just wanted to read as I was immediately surprised by the fact that Google has something to say in that domain. My curiosity did not come without an answer 😉 .
It was interesting reading the following:
Some governments will struggle with how much free expression is too much, he said. Even in Western democracies, such as France and Germany, posting information about the Nazi Party is prohibited, Schmidt said, and other governments will struggle with what expression to allow.
Hey! It is not the first time that I see comparing apples and oranges, but I do not think that it is fair to compare revisioninsm with what happens somewhere else with the support of Google !