<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The adventures of Coccobill &#187; BEA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.poglianis.net/category/it/oracle/bea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.poglianis.net</link>
	<description>Opinions... because I choose. Always !</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 14:21:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What a surprise: Oracle says WebLogic is its future strategic server</title>
		<link>http://tech.poglianis.net/2008/08/12/what-a-surprise-oracle-says-weblogic-is-its-future-strategic-server/</link>
		<comments>http://tech.poglianis.net/2008/08/12/what-a-surprise-oracle-says-weblogic-is-its-future-strategic-server/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 09:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stefano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.poglianis.net/2008/08/12/what-a-surprise-oracle-says-weblogic-is-its-future-strategic-server/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today I received on of the newsletter to which I subscribe. I read it because of an article which seemed to be very interesting &#8220;Oracle says Weblogic is its future strategic server&#8221;. In the beginning, I liked this assertion &#8220;To many, the Oracle products seemed a mere adjunct to its data base&#8221;. Great! I like [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I received on of the newsletter to which I subscribe. I read it because of an article which seemed to be very interesting &#8220;Oracle says Weblogic is its future strategic server&#8221;. <br />In the beginning, I liked this assertion &#8220;To many, the Oracle products seemed a mere adjunct to its data base&#8221;. Great! I like it!</p>
<p>The author, then, references the article <a href="http://searchsoa.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid26_gci1324804,00.html?track=NL-130&#038;ad=654328&amp;asrc=EM_USC_4205195&amp;uid=1298390">Oracle re-brands BEA WebLogic as its strategic server for SOA</a>. In this article, there is an even better quote, from Bloomberg:<br />
<blockquote>&#8220;If you read between the lines, when Oracle now says &#8216;Oracle WebLogic Server Enterprise Edition is the application server of choice&#8217;, what they mean is that <b>the application server they had before</b> the BEA acquisition, to put it mildly, <b>wasn&#8217;t the application server of choice</b> &#8212; for just about anybody&#8221;.</p></blockquote>
<p> <img src='http://tech.poglianis.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tech.poglianis.net/2008/08/12/what-a-surprise-oracle-says-weblogic-is-its-future-strategic-server/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BEA wants more money. And Sun ?</title>
		<link>http://tech.poglianis.net/2007/10/14/bea-wants-more-money-and-sun/</link>
		<comments>http://tech.poglianis.net/2007/10/14/bea-wants-more-money-and-sun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 21:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stefano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.poglianis.net/2007/10/14/bea-wants-more-money-and-sun/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Few years ago, when I left Sun, I thought that the medium term scenario would involve some &#8220;fusion&#8221; between Oracle (Applications + database), BEA (middleware) and Sun (hardware).In this way, the new entity would be able to compete against IBM and against MSFT (well MSFT+Dell or MSFT+HP, according to the situations). I am reading these [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Few years ago, when I left Sun, I thought that the medium term scenario would involve some &#8220;fusion&#8221; between Oracle (Applications + database), BEA (middleware) and Sun (hardware).<br />In this way, the new entity would be able to compete against IBM and against MSFT (well MSFT+Dell or MSFT+HP, according to the situations).</p>
<p>I am reading these days that BEA <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/20548?netht=101207dailynews2&amp;&amp;nladname=101207dailynews">just refused a friendly buyout</a> offer from Oracle because the proposed price was seen as undervaluating BEA (I have issues understanding which evidence would support this statement&#8230; but this is not the point)! So, BEA is asking Oracle to make a better economical offer.&nbsp; There is not opposition to Oracle&#8217;s initiative.</p>
<p>And this seems logical to me. <br />The scenario is simplifying.</p>
<p>So,&nbsp; would next step really be Sun ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tech.poglianis.net/2007/10/14/bea-wants-more-money-and-sun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
