<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The adventures of Coccobill &#187; WPF</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.poglianis.net/category/clienttechnologies/ria/wpf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.poglianis.net</link>
	<description>Opinions... because I choose. Always !</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 14:21:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How to be an instant Web me-2.0 developer</title>
		<link>http://tech.poglianis.net/2008/08/08/how-to-be-an-instant-web-me-20-developer/</link>
		<comments>http://tech.poglianis.net/2008/08/08/how-to-be-an-instant-web-me-20-developer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 15:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stefano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AJAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apollo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ScriptingLanguages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SilverLight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WPF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.poglianis.net/2008/08/08/how-to-be-an-instant-web-me-20-developer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article [1] [1] from Verity Stob [2] [2] at The Register [3] [3] made me laughing!  How true it is in many aspects. I really liked it all, but I think I will use these two pictures in my next Web2.0 presentation to present the difference between Web1.0 and Web2.0: Of course, I was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/07/07/web20_for_developers/">This article<span class="annlink-inline"> [1]</span><span class="annlink-inline"> [1]</span></a> from <a href="http://search.theregister.co.uk/?author=Verity%20Stob">Verity Stob<span class="annlink-inline"> [2]</span><span class="annlink-inline"> [2]</span></a> at <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/">The Register<span class="annlink-inline"> [3]</span><span class="annlink-inline"> [3]</span></a> made me laughing!  How true it is in many aspects.</p>
<p>I really liked it all, but I think I will use these two pictures in my next Web2.0 presentation to present the difference between Web1.0 and Web2.0:</p>
<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><img title="Look, I'm using the silly UML stick figure, despite slagging it off. What a hypocrit I am" src="http://regmedia.co.uk/2008/07/02/fig2.gif" alt="Block diagram showing Web 1.0 program architecture" width="295" height="508" /></td>
<td><img title="There must be a better tool for doing this sort of thing than Visio. I hate the way it handles colours" src="http://regmedia.co.uk/2008/07/02/fig3.gif" alt="Architecture diagram illustrating the confusion inherent in Web 2.0 applications" width="295" height="508" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Of course, I was also laughing (and strongly agreeing) with those other comments:</p>
<ul>
<li>Java Applets ?<br />
I bet Sun hopes that everybody had forgotten</li>
<li>Google Web Kit (GWT)<br />
Eughh! what were they thinking ?</li>
<li>Dojo<br />
Perhaps come back in a year, if they make a design environment to go with.</li>
</ul>
<p>As to the last sentence on Dojo, I think that it is really something we may need to consider. We need to <a href="http://tech.poglianis.net/2008/01/09/dreaming-of-hiding-the-complexity/">hide the complexity<span class="annlink-inline"> [4]</span><span class="annlink-inline"> [4]</span></a> of Dojo behind some easy-to-use design environment which would make it possible for more people to enter the game.</p>
<p><script src="http://shots.snap.com//client/inject.js?site_name=0" type="text/javascript"></script></p>
<hr class="annlink-block" />
<ol class="annlink-block" style="text-align: left;">
<li>http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/07/07/web20_for_developers/</li>
<li>http://search.theregister.co.uk/?author=Verity%20Stob</li>
<li>http://www.theregister.co.uk/</li>
<li>http://tech.poglianis.net/2008/01/09/dreaming-of-hiding-the-complexity/</li>
</ol>
<p><script src="http://shots.snap.com//client/inject.js?site_name=0" type="text/javascript"></script></p>
<hr class="annlink-block" />
<ol class="annlink-block" style="text-align: left;">
<li>http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/07/07/web20_for_developers/</li>
<li>http://search.theregister.co.uk/?author=Verity%20Stob</li>
<li>http://www.theregister.co.uk/</li>
<li>http://tech.poglianis.net/2008/01/09/dreaming-of-hiding-the-complexity/</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tech.poglianis.net/2008/08/08/how-to-be-an-instant-web-me-20-developer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SilverLight</title>
		<link>http://tech.poglianis.net/2007/04/26/silverlight/</link>
		<comments>http://tech.poglianis.net/2007/04/26/silverlight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stefano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AJAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ClientTechs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SilverLight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WPF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.poglianis.net/2007/04/26/silverlight/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been reading about SilverLight, the new technology from Microsoft that has been labeled as the Flash-Killer.What I find interesting is that the positioning of SilverLight on respect to Windows Presentation Foundation (and Vista in general) from Microsoft seems, to me, very similar to the positioning of Flex with respect to Apollo from Adobe.. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been reading about <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/silverlight/default_01.aspx">SilverLight,</a> the new technology from Microsoft that has been labeled as the Flash-Killer.<br />What I find interesting is that the positioning of SilverLight on respect to <a href="http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/netframework/aa663326.aspx">Windows Presentation Foundation</a> (and Vista in general) from Microsoft seems, to me, very similar to the positioning of <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&#038;ct=res&#038;cd=1&#038;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.adobe.com%2Fproducts%2Fflex%2F&#038;ei=KyAtRojSL5vWgwTBwtzAAg&#038;usg=AFrqEzfLEX8mR0YvaUG8zsNgWzDfc45dMA&#038;sig2=duDFMjAMEhsnbG9GmA6Zgg">Flex</a> with respect to <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&#038;ct=res&#038;cd=2&#038;url=http%3A%2F%2Flabs.adobe.com%2Ftechnologies%2Fapollo%2F&#038;ei=byAtRrHyOY-IgASm_oSvAg&#038;usg=AFrqEzdjTCvdz9ZbV5LXv9YitRB-2XJw4Q&#038;sig2=djUiihJcX9fLUuy2mmaC_w">Apollo</a> from Adobe..</p>
<p>It is very much another example of a <b>client-side container that replaces the role played by the Browser</b> so far. With this move, not only Microsoft provides container functuionalities inside the Operating System itself (WPF) but, also, provides an<strong> <span style="color: Red;">&#8220;express version&#8221;</span></strong> of it (SilverLight), which does not require Vista and that can work on the Mac. </p>
<p>I am still unclear why Microsoft does not also target Linux. But, probably, there will be someone who will <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&#038;ct=res&#038;cd=1&#038;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mono-project.com%2F&#038;ei=uCItRteRNY7WgwTzyu3CAg&#038;usg=AFrqEzffmh7MERG6gJ-8IvsSrXiOHiCByQ&#038;sig2=4l08rBd86b6ZKnIYU8HsAw">do on their behalf</a>&#8230;. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tech.poglianis.net/2007/04/26/silverlight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
